What a aerospace engineer earns, by metro

Pay for aerospace engineers is unusually consistent across the country: $79,610 at the bottom of the range, $191,260 at the top, a spread of only 2.4×. Where you work matters less for this role than it does for most — which usually points to pay being set by structure (scales, licensure, collective agreements) rather than local bidding.

What the percentile band tells you

Ten per cent of aerospace engineers earn below $86,700 and ten per cent above $205,890 — a 2.37× band. The upside from median to 90th percentile is 53%, which is a normal amount of room for experience and specialisation to matter. An offer below the 25th percentile is worth questioning; one above the 75th is worth taking seriously.

Geography barely moves this one

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont (CA) leads and Hot Springs (AR) trails, but the gap is modest. For a role like this the more useful comparison is not between cities but between the 10th and 90th percentile within one — see the band above.

Highest paying metros

Lowest paying metros

Huntsville is the cluster

Huntsville has 42.03× the national concentration of aerospace engineers — the densest market in the country for this role, with 4,880 employed locally. Pay there is $131,090, which does not put it near the top of the pay table. Concentration and compensation are different things — a dense market is easier to get hired in and easier to move around within, but the competition that makes it dense also caps what employers need to offer.

Where the role is most concentrated

Largest employers by metro

Current openings

About this data

Figures come from the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics programme, May 2025 release, SOC code 17-2011. OEWS surveys employers, so it reports what is actually paid rather than what job advertisements claim, and it excludes the self-employed. Estimates are published for 92 of 528 metropolitan areas; the remaining 436 had too few survey responses for BLS to publish without risking disclosure, so they are absent here rather than estimated. For a specialised role that is normal. Read the methodology.